LA Times Cover-Up: When a Riot is Not a Riot
" packs
of young people were roaming along Hollywood and attacking people"
"As many as 40 robbers
were believed to be involved"
"two young black men were detained in
handcuffs before being released with the terse explanation that they had
mistakenly been stopped because they
matched the general description of the robbers. " (ie.
young and black)
REALLY? What are we, stupid now? So you expect us to believe that in the immediate wake of the Zimmerman trial, among riots in Oakland and Sanford FL, and even a live cat burning, over a trial which has been teaming with government sponsored race baiting since day one, suddenly by sheer coincidence, FORTY young black men all decide to roam the
streets attacking people and looting.
And that isn't considered a riot, much less a Zimmerman Riot??
How can that NOT be related to the Zimmerman case?
MSM SOP: Cover
up the illicit actions of the Blue team.
Bring to light and skew the truth of any actions or inactions of the Red
team. Nothing to see here. Move along.
No comments:
Post a Comment